CorrectKMI panel rulingPenaltySignificantQuiet

Penalty to Chelsea after VAR review

Saturday, 30 August 2025 · 2025-26 · 52'

What happened

The penalty was awarded following a VAR review. The decision does not appear among the errors the KMI panel logged for 2025-26, which means the panel voted it correct.

On the pitch: No penalty
VAR: VAR overturned
Benefited: CHE Chelsea
Harmed: FUL Fulham

Fan verdict

Was the final decision right?

One tap, then pick your club. We show how Chelsea fans, Fulham fans and everyone else answered.

Sources

Officials & their calls

RefereeRob JonesErrorcareer on file: 10 err · 23%VARMichael SalisburyCorrectcareer on file: 9 err · 47%Assistant VARScott LedgerCorrectcareer on file: 1 err · 50%

What the fans thought

Meltdown91

37 of 278 comments in the r/soccer post-match thread were angry about the officiating. Main gripes: penalty and handball.

“Another brilliant day out from PGMOL. Completely changed the direction of the entire match and rather than getting the entertaining derby it promised we got an absolute s***fest that nobody will remember for anything oth…” · 98 upvotes

“Fulham got f***ed hard, the officials are diabolical.” · 57 upvotes

Whole-match mood, not this incident alone.

Something wrong or missing?

This record is community-maintained. If there's a panel ruling, a better source or a correction, send it in.

Edit on GitHub Report a correction

What happened

Sources

Related incidents

Kluivert equaliser stands after VAR checks the build-up

No penalty for Ajer's shot striking Truffert's arm

Calafiori goal ruled out for Konsa offside

Kamada's first Palace goal ruled out for a razor-thin offside