No penalty for Maatsen's reckless challenge on Guimarães
Monday, 31 August 2026 · 2026-27 · 90+8'
What happened
In the eighth minute of added time, Ian Maatsen, already on a yellow, caught Bruno Guimarães' standing leg without touching the ball. Jarred Gillett played on and VAR did not recommend a review. The KMI panel ruled 5-0 that it was a penalty and a second yellow. Arsenal won 1-0 through Saka regardless.
- On the pitch
- No penalty: play on
- VAR
- VAR did not intervene
- Benefited
- AVL Aston Villa
- Harmed
- ARS Arsenal
Fan verdict
Was the final decision right?
One tap, then pick your club. We show how Aston Villa fans, Arsenal fans and everyone else answered.
Fallout
- The KMI panel also ruled that Maatsen should have received a second yellow card.
Reaction
“The panel felt that a penalty should have been awarded on-field for Maatsen's reckless challenge on Guimaraes. Clear contact was made on the attacker's standing leg and Maatsen made no contact with the ball.”
KMI panel · Match Round 2 ruling · source
Sources
- officialPremier League Match Round 2 – Key Match Incidents Panel outcomesPremier League
- officialFull KMI panel decisions, Match Round 2 (PDF)Premier League
- reportPremier League panel confirms Aston Villa VAR error in Arsenal defeatRead Aston Villa
- analysisPremier League VAR review: How was Enzo Fernández not offside?ESPN
- officialVAR got it wrong! Premier League admit massive refereeing mistake in Arsenal win over Aston VillaGoal